Guest Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 I'm not really political but . . . . did anyone see the news last night with our PM Gordon Brown talking about giving 1:1 in schools? Wow great I thought..... lower ratios coming then? I began to wonder why then is this governments 10 yr childcare strategy and the introduction of the EYFS intent on implementing a system of ratios which directly go against this line of thought? Surely, if Mr Brown saw the benefits of 1:1 within the primary settings, giving the option for higher adult : child ratios within the education/childcare system shouldn't even be on the cards? Just thought I'd throw it open for a bit of debate?!?! What about another lobby? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnonyMouse_1027 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 did see it.. couldnt belive my ears.. .was it not just a campaign on his part fantastic news if he means it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnonyMouse_8623 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 promises! promises! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnonyMouse_3139 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Remember...something in a pre-election or even pre, pre-election manifesto doesnt have to happen. I learned my lesson by believing Tony Blairs 'education, education, education'. It will all come down to funding and if that doesnt appear then nor will any promises, suggestions or hopes. Is it mandatory to be cynical if you work in education??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnonyMouse_8623 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 It helps!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 I'm not really political but . . . .did anyone see the news last night with our PM Gordon Brown talking about giving 1:1 in schools? Wow great I thought..... lower ratios coming then? I began to wonder why then is this governments 10 yr childcare strategy and the introduction of the EYFS intent on implementing a system of ratios which directly go against this line of thought? Surely, if Mr Brown saw the benefits of 1:1 within the primary settings, giving the option for higher adult : child ratios within the education/childcare system shouldn't even be on the cards? Just thought I'd throw it open for a bit of debate?!?! What about another lobby? the article I read stated that this 1:1 business is destined for pupils in the secondary sector - when it's far too late for most children! I have already seen posts advertised in the Yorkshire area, 1:1 tutors for state secondary schools @£22 per hour!! Can do this work after school too, poor kids, they'll turn to booze even faster now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnonyMouse_8466 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 poor kids, they'll turn to booze even faster now! ... but at least with the extra tuition they'll be able to work out what their change should be from the off licence! Maz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnonyMouse_3139 Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 The latest from the Ed minister is that they would like to have more support for children in primary schools with regards to lit and maths, and they are planning to put an extra £24 million over 5 years into providing the support, but it might not mean extra staff, just to use existing teachers and classroom assistants. Sahme they dont just let the teachers that already exist, get on with their jobs rather than introduce more changes. I knew the money would be rubbish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.