AnonyMouse_73 Posted June 4, 2004 Posted June 4, 2004 I do remember reading (but can't rememeber where) when the profile was trialled that only a third of children were expected to achieve ALL of the ELGs, with two thirds (approx) achieving between 1 and all. About 2% to exceed, and 2% to not achieve any. This would then appear to follow the usual normal distribution. Obviously there will be settings where most of the children score all or beyond, and otheres, like mine where we are almost 100% EAL, and high special needs aswell, tending to score lower. It will be interesting to see the national data later on in the year, to see if this pattern is retained, and if it is, I hope it goes some way to take the pressure of everyone thinking that all children must achieve all ELGs when we all know that is unrealistic. does that make any sense?
Recommended Posts